Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add third-party payment. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add citation. |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. | Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. American doctors do research to find reasons to carry out non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="fleiss1999">{{REFbook | ||
|last=Fleiss | |||
|first=Paul | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2= | |||
|first2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|year=1999 | |||
|title=An Analysis of Bias Regarding Circumcision in American Medical Literature: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. | |||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ljZZ9ZvD_kQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA379&ots=GA2KpzMECk&sig=jFqDYQhV0sqAWil6LDZWXnQdJO8#v=onepage&q&f=false | |||
|work=Male and Female Circumcision: | |||
|editor=Denniston, George C., Hodges, Frederick Mansfield, Milos, Marilyn | |||
|edition= | |||
|volume= | |||
|chapter= | |||
|pages=379-401 | |||
|location=New York | |||
|publisher=Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers | |||
|isbn=0-306-46131-5 | |||
|quote= | |||
|accessdate=2020-08-07 | |||
|note= | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==Review of the circumcision literature== | ==Review of the circumcision literature== | ||