Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Statements from medical trade associations: Revise text. |
||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
==Statements from medical trade associations== | ==Statements from medical trade associations== | ||
Medical trade associations exist to protect and advance the financial and business interests of their fellows (members). A few medical trade associations have issued statements regarding non-therapeutic circumcision of children. Circumcision policy statements frequently exclude discussions of sexual, psychological, human rights, ethical, and legal issues.<ref name="goldman2004">{{REFjournal | Medical trade associations exist to protect and advance the financial and business interests of their fellows (members). A few medical trade associations, whose members perform non-therapeutic circumcision, have issued statements regarding non-therapeutic circumcision of children. Circumcision policy statements frequently exclude discussions of sexual, psychological, human rights, ethical, and legal issues, and the anatomy and functions of the foreskin.<ref name="goldman2004">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Goldman | |last=Goldman | ||
|first=Ronald | |first=Ronald | ||