Wikipedia bias on circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text; add REF section. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|quote=“I’m embarrassed, to be quite honest, and I’ve said so for a long time. I’ve been a leading critic of Wikipedia for over a decade now,” | |quote=“I’m embarrassed, to be quite honest, and I’ve said so for a long time. I’ve been a leading critic of Wikipedia for over a decade now,” | ||
}}</ref> [https://www.heartland.org The Heartland Institute] pronounced Wikipedia to be "broken, biased, and corrupt".<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.heartland.org/topics/infotech-telecom/Wikipedia/index.html | |||
|archived= | |||
|title=Wikipedia: The fake encyclopedia | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=Heartland Institute | |||
|website= | |||
|date= | |||
|accessdate=2021-07-27 | |||
|format= | |||
|quote= | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Unfortunately, [[bias]] is equally present in articles about and related to male [[circumcision]]. | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Database]] | [[Category:Database]] | ||
[[Category:USA]] | |||