Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
m wikify urethra |
m using template:RCT Bailey et al 2007 |
||
| Line 347: | Line 347: | ||
}}</ref> so there is intense interest in keeping the Goose alive. [[Third-party payment]] is frequently available in the United States. | }}</ref> so there is intense interest in keeping the Goose alive. [[Third-party payment]] is frequently available in the United States. | ||
Several state Medicaid programs stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the early in the 21st Century. It is believed that this caused alarm in the circumcision industry. Shortly after ''The Lancet'' published two reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from sub-Saharan Africa,<ref name="bailey2007">{{ | Several state Medicaid programs stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the early in the 21st Century. It is believed that this caused alarm in the circumcision industry. Shortly after ''The Lancet'' published two reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from sub-Saharan Africa,<ref name="bailey2007">{{RCT Bailey et al 2007}}</ref><ref name="gray2007">{{REFjournal | ||
}}</ref><ref name="gray2007">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Gray | |last=Gray | ||
|init=RH | |init=RH | ||