United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
m add interwiki link |
m →Children Act 1989: typo |
||
| Line 668: | Line 668: | ||
}}</ref> One perhaps unexpected effect of the Children Act 1989 was to bring circumcision cases into family court when parents disagreed about circumcision of a son. | }}</ref> One perhaps unexpected effect of the Children Act 1989 was to bring circumcision cases into family court when parents disagreed about circumcision of a son. | ||
The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/ Law Commission of England and Wales] had proposed to recommend that circumcision of male children be made lawful. The late [[Christopher P. Price]], solicitor | The [https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/ Law Commission of England and Wales] had proposed to recommend that circumcision of male children be made lawful. The late [[Christopher P. Price]], solicitor, (1996 submitted a brief to the Law Commission in opposition to the proposal,<ref name="price1996">{{REFdocument | ||
|title=Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront | |title=Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront | ||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/ | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/ | ||
|contribution= | |contribution= | ||
|last=Price | |last=Price | ||
|first=Christopher P | |first=Christopher P. | ||
|init=CP | |||
|author-link=Christopher P. Price | |author-link=Christopher P. Price | ||
|publisher=Circumcision Reference Library | |publisher=Circumcision Reference Library | ||