17,111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wikify
Historically, neonatal [[circumcision ]] was promoted during late Victorian times in the English-speaking parts of [[Canada]], [[Australia]], [[New Zealand]], the [[United States ]] and the [[United Kingdom ]] and was widely practiced during the first part of the 20th century in these countries. However, the practice declined sharply in the United Kingdom after the Second World War, and somewhat later in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In South Korea, circumcision was largely unknown before the establishment of the United States trusteeship in 1945.
== Male circumcision to prevent masturbation ==
Non-religious circumcision in English-speaking countries arose in a climate of negative attitudes towards sex, especially concerning masturbation. In her 1978 article ''The Ritual of Circumcision'',<ref name=Paige78/> Karen Erickson Paige writes: "In the United States, the current medical rationale for circumcision developed ''after'' the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin, or prepuce, was to control 'masturbatory insanity' – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the 'polluting' practice of 'self-abuse.'"
"Self-abuse" was a term commonly used to describe [[masturbation ]] in the 19th century. According to Paige, "treatments ranged from diet, moral exhortations, hydrotherapy, and marriage, to such drastic measures as surgery, physical restraints, frights, and punishment. Some doctors recommended covering the penis with plaster of Paris, leather, or rubber; cauterization; making boys wear chastity belts or spiked rings; and in extreme cases, castration." Paige details how circumcision became popular as a masturbation remedy:
:"In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published ''On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation,'' and two years later another British doctor wrote ''Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It,'' which listed the reasons for removing the 'vestigial' prepuce. Evidently the foreskin could cause 'nocturnal incontinence,' hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might 'give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.' Another physician, [http://sandiegohistory.org/bio/remondino/remondino.htm P.C. Remondino], added that 'circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity...it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.' No wonder it became a popular remedy."<ref name=Paige78/>
:"Covering the organs with a cage has been practiced with entire success. A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed. If any attempt is made to watch the child, he should be so carefully surrounded by vigilance that he cannot possibly transgress without detection. If he is only partially watched, he soon learns to elude observation, and thus the effect is only to make him cunning in his vice."
[[Robert Darby]], writing in the ''Australian Medical Journal'', noted that some 19th-century circumcision advocates—and their opponents—believed that the foreskin was sexually sensitive:
:In the 19th century the role of the [[foreskin ]] in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to [[masturbation]]. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814–1875) damned it as "a source of serious mischief", and most of his contemporaries concurred. Both opponents and supporters of circumcision agreed that the significant role the foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that "circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse", and both he and Acton considered the foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. [[Jonathan Hutchinson]], English surgeon and pathologist (1828–1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.<ref name="darbymja2003">{{REFjournal
|last=Darby
|first=Robert