Political attitutes towards MGM: Difference between revisions
m wikify country names |
m wikify medical indication |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Political attitudes toward MGM''' vary from nation to nation. | '''Political attitudes toward MGM''' vary from nation to nation. | ||
While [[FGM]] is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept [[MGM]] on minors. This is a classical [[bias]] situation. Furthermore, every country worldwide punishes bodily harm. [[MGM]] on minors without any medical indication is bodily harm by definition. | While [[FGM]] is outlawed in almost every country, most countries still ignore, tolerate or accept [[MGM]] on minors. This is a classical [[bias]] situation. Furthermore, every country worldwide punishes bodily harm. [[MGM]] on minors without any [[medical indication]] is bodily harm by definition. | ||
{{Incomplete}} | {{Incomplete}} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Germany == | == Germany == | ||
=== Alliance 90/The Greens === | === Alliance 90/The Greens === | ||
* 2014: The "[[Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Säkulare Grüne]]" (Nationwide Working Community of Secular Greens) votes against male circumcision on minors without medical indication, in their "Statement on medically indicated genital circumcision of boys". | * 2014: The "[[Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Säkulare Grüne]]" (Nationwide Working Community of Secular Greens) votes against male circumcision on minors without [[medical indication]], in their "Statement on medically indicated genital circumcision of boys". | ||
== [[Norway]] == | == [[Norway]] == | ||