Indiana - Wrongful circumcision: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m remove extra blank lines
Add SEEALSO section
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.
In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.
{{SEEALSO}}
[[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| Physiological functions of the foreskin]]


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}