Bertran Auvert: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 67: Line 67:
== Auvert's Circumcision Study ==
== Auvert's Circumcision Study ==
An RCT funded by the United States [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH)<ref name='DOC 2008'>
An RCT funded by the United States [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH)<ref name='DOC 2008'>
{{REFweb
{{REFnews
  | last=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
  | url=http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html
| first=
| year=2008
  | title=The Use of Male Circumcision to Prevent HIV Infection
  | title=The Use of Male Circumcision to Prevent HIV Infection
  | url=http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html
  | date=2008
| publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
| quote=...funding from the United States National Institutes of Health to conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Africa.
  | accessdate=2011-03-05
  | accessdate=2011-03-05
| quote = ...funding from the United States National Institutes of Health to conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Africa.
}}
}}
</ref> was carried out in Orange Farm, South Africa under the supervision of Bertran Auvert.<ref>Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. (2005) Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2:e298. [http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298 Full Text]</ref> The British medical journal the Lancet decided against publishing Bertran's study. Lancet officials, following standard policy at the journal, refused to comment on why the study was turned down.<ref>Schoofs, M, Lueck, S, & Phillips, MM. (2005, July 05). Study says circumcision reduces AIDS risk by 70%. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.</ref>
</ref> was carried out in Orange Farm, South Africa under the supervision of Bertran Auvert.<ref>Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. (2005) Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2:e298. [http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298 Full Text]</ref> The British medical journal the Lancet decided against publishing Bertran's study. Lancet officials, following standard policy at the journal, refused to comment on why the study was turned down.<ref>Schoofs, M, Lueck, S, & Phillips, MM. (2005, July 05). Study says circumcision reduces AIDS risk by 70%. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.</ref>