Circumcision and HIV: Difference between revisions

WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m wikify Israel
Line 143: Line 143:
}}
}}


Alcena and Fink lacked a hypothesis to explain why the foreskin would be an entry point for HIV infection, but this was supplied by circumcision promoter [[Gerald N. Weiss]] and two colleagues. Weiss et al. (1993) produced the plausible but incorrect hypothesis that [[Langerhans cells]] attracted HIV. A medical journal in Israel was willing to publish the paper by Weiss et al.<ref name="weiss1993">{{REFjournal
Alcena and Fink lacked a hypothesis to explain why the foreskin would be an entry point for HIV infection, but this was supplied by circumcision promoter [[Gerald N. Weiss]] and two colleagues. Weiss et al. (1993) produced the plausible but incorrect hypothesis that [[Langerhans cells]] attracted HIV. A medical journal in [[Israel]] was willing to publish the paper by Weiss et al.<ref name="weiss1993">{{REFjournal
  |last=Weiss
  |last=Weiss
  |first=Gerald N.
  |first=Gerald N.
Line 890: Line 890:
The statistics suggest that removal of the protective [[foreskin]] by circumcision increases the risk of contracting [[HIV]] infection.
The statistics suggest that removal of the protective [[foreskin]] by circumcision increases the risk of contracting [[HIV]] infection.


=== Israel ===
=== [[Israel]] ===
Despite circumcision being near-universal, [[HIV]] is an increasing problem in Israel.<ref>{{REFweb
Despite circumcision being near-universal, [[HIV]] is an increasing problem in [[Israel]].<ref>{{REFweb
  |url=https://www.haaretz.com/1.4998790
  |url=https://www.haaretz.com/1.4998790
  |title=Failing the AIDS Test
  |title=Failing the AIDS Test