Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Antisemitism: Difference between revisions

Line 23:

=== IntactiWiki comment ===

: Ms. Lipstadt and Mr. Keyak mistakenly believe that child genital mutilation is a religious right. The [[human rights]], which they also support, say the opposite. If you want to protect [[human rights]] for all people, you must not ignore children. They are not objects of fulfillment for religious parents. Therefore, banning religiously motivated genital mutilation is anything but anti-Semitic. There is no right whatsoever to harm the bodies of other people, let alone defenseless children, for religious or cultural reasons.

: Ms. Lipstadt and Mr. Keyak mistakenly believe that child genital mutilation is a religious right. The [[human rights]], which they also support, say the opposite. If you want to protect [[human rights]] for all people, you must not ignore children. They are not objects of fulfillment for religious parents. Therefore, banning religiously motivated genital mutilation is anything but anti-Semitic. There is no right whatsoever to harm the bodies of other people, let alone defenseless children, for religious or cultural reasons.<ref name="iccpr1966>{{REFweb

|url=https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

|title=International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

|publisher=Office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights

|date=1976-03-23

|accessdate=2024-05-09

}}</ref>

* [[Human rights]]

* [[United States of America]]

* {{URLwebsite|https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/under-secretary-for-civilian-security-democracy-and-human-rights/office-of-the-special-envoy-to-monitor-and-combat-antisemitism/|2023-03-23}}

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 === IntactiWiki comment ===
-: Ms. Lipstadt and Mr. Keyak mistakenly believe that child genital mutilation is a religious right. The [[human rights]], which they also support, say the opposite. If you want to protect [[human rights]] for all people, you must not ignore children. They are not objects of fulfillment for religious parents. Therefore, banning religiously motivated genital mutilation is anything but anti-Semitic. There is no right whatsoever to harm the bodies of other people, let alone defenseless children, for religious or cultural reasons.
+: Ms. Lipstadt and Mr. Keyak mistakenly believe that child genital mutilation is a religious right. The [[human rights]], which they also support, say the opposite. If you want to protect [[human rights]] for all people, you must not ignore children. They are not objects of fulfillment for religious parents. Therefore, banning religiously motivated genital mutilation is anything but anti-Semitic. There is no right whatsoever to harm the bodies of other people, let alone defenseless children, for religious or cultural reasons.<ref name="iccpr1966>{{REFweb
+ |url=https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
+ |title=International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
+ |publisher=Office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights
+ |date=1976-03-23
+ |accessdate=2024-05-09
+}}</ref>
+{{SEEALSO}}
+* [[Human rights]]
+* [[United States of America]]
 {{LINKS}}
 * {{URLwebsite|https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/under-secretary-for-civilian-security-democracy-and-human-rights/office-of-the-special-envoy-to-monitor-and-combat-antisemitism/|2023-03-23}}