Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add link in SEEALSO section. |
m using template BoyleGJ SvobodaJS PriceCP TurnerJN 2000 |
||
| Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
=== 2000 === | === 2000 === | ||
* Boyle et al. (2000) argue strongly, that in common law jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and the United States, parents lack the capacity to consent to non-therapeutic circumcision, so it constitutes criminal assault, whenever it is performed. | * Boyle et al. (2000) argue strongly, that in common law jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and the United States, parents lack the capacity to consent to non-therapeutic circumcision, so it constitutes criminal assault, whenever it is performed. | ||
: {{ | : {{BoyleGJ SvobodaJS PriceCP TurnerJN 2000}} | ||
}} | |||
* Dr. [[Arif Bhimji]] (2000) argues that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in Canada violates the rights protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. | * Dr. [[Arif Bhimji]] (2000) argues that non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in Canada violates the rights protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. | ||