India: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Medical science: Add text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Medical science: Add quote. |
||
| Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
|accessdate=2024-07-05 | |accessdate=2024-07-05 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
* Shahid (2012) | * Shahid (2012) <ref name="shahid2012">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Shahid | |||
|first= | |||
|init=SK | |||
|author-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Phimosis in Children | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=ISRN Urol | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2012-03-05 | |||
|volume= | |||
|issue= | |||
|article=707329 | |||
|page= | |||
|pages= | |||
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329654/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote=When a child is brought with history of inability to retract the foreskin, it is important to confirm whether it is physiologic or pathologic. Management depends on age of child, type of nonretraction, severity of phimosis, cause, and associated morbid conditions. | |||
|pubmedID=23002427 | |||
|pubmedCID=3329654 | |||
|DOI=10.5402/2012/707329 | |||
|doi= | |||
|accessdate=2025-07-05 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
* Manekar et al. (2022) surveyed paediatricans across India and found that most were so poorly trained that they could not distinguish between normal physiological phimosis and pathological phimosis in boys, which may result in large numbers of unnecessary circumcisions of boys.<ref name="manetar2022">{{REFjournal | * Manekar et al. (2022) surveyed paediatricans across India and found that most were so poorly trained that they could not distinguish between normal physiological phimosis and pathological phimosis in boys, which may result in large numbers of unnecessary circumcisions of boys.<ref name="manetar2022">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Manetar | |last=Manetar | ||