Australia: Difference between revisions

Line 663:

|pubmedCID=

|accessdate=2023-11-18

}}</ref> As stated above, the incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys declined precipitously after the publication of these letters, so most men under forty-~~eight~~ are [[intact]]. These [[foreskinned]] men are now becoming fathers. They are aware of the value and functions<ref name="helard2014">{{REFweb

}}</ref> As stated above, the incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys declined precipitously after the publication of these letters, so most men under forty-three are [[intact]]. These [[foreskinned]] men are now becoming fathers. They are aware of the value and functions<ref name="helard2014">{{REFweb

|url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/

|title=Functions of the Foreskin

Line 675:

|format=

|quote=

}}</ref> of the [[foreskin]] so these [[intact]] fathers usually do not want any son to be [[circumcised]]. Moreover, public hospitals in Australia do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].

}}</ref> of the [[foreskin]] so these [[intact]] fathers usually do not want any son to be [[circumcised]]. Moreover, public hospitals in Australia do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].<ref name="tanny2015">{{REFjournal

|last=Na

|first=

|init=AF

|author-link=

|last2=Tanny

|first2=

|init2=SPT

|author2-link=

|last3=Hutson

|first3=

|init3=JM

|author3-link=

|etal=no

|title=Circumcision: Is it worth it for 21st-century Australian boys?

|language=

|journal= J Paediatr Child Health

|location=

|date=2015-06

|volume=51

|issue=6

|article=

|page=

|pages=580-3

|url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jpc.12825

|archived=

|quote=Most Australian states withdrew circumcision from the range of free services provided in public hospitals through Medicare funding system.

|pubmedID=25683279

|pubmedCID=

|DOI=10.1111/jpc.12825

|accessdate=2024-09-16

}}</ref>

As a consequence, it appears that the efforts of the [[RACP]] to revitalize the circumcision industry in Australia<ref name="RACP2022" /> may have scant success. The incidence of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys recently has been variously reported to be 4-10 percent.

As a consequence, it appears that the efforts of the [[RACP]] to revitalize the [[circumcision industry]] in Australia<ref name="RACP2022" /> may have scant success. The incidence of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys recently has been variously reported to be 4-10 percent.

==Parental information==

@@ Line 663: / Line 663: @@
   |pubmedCID=
   |accessdate=2023-11-18
-}}</ref> As stated above, the incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys declined precipitously after the publication of these letters, so most men under forty-eight are [[intact]]. These [[foreskinned]] men are now becoming fathers. They are aware of the value and functions<ref name="helard2014">{{REFweb
+}}</ref> As stated above, the incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys declined precipitously after the publication of these letters, so most men under forty-three are [[intact]]. These [[foreskinned]] men are now becoming fathers. They are aware of the value and functions<ref name="helard2014">{{REFweb
   |url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/
   |title=Functions of the Foreskin
@@ Line 675: / Line 675: @@
   |format=
   |quote=
-}}</ref> of the [[foreskin]] so these [[intact]] fathers usually do not want any son to be [[circumcised]]. Moreover, public hospitals in Australia do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].
+}}</ref> of the [[foreskin]] so these [[intact]] fathers usually do not want any son to be [[circumcised]]. Moreover, public hospitals in Australia do not permit the performance of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]].<ref name="tanny2015">{{REFjournal
+ |last=Na
+ |first=
+ |init=AF
+ |author-link=
+ |last2=Tanny
+ |first2=
+ |init2=SPT
+ |author2-link=
+ |last3=Hutson
+ |first3=
+ |init3=JM
+ |author3-link=
+ |etal=no
+ |title=Circumcision: Is it worth it for 21st-century Australian boys?
+ |language=
+ |journal= J Paediatr Child Health
+ |location=
+ |date=2015-06
+ |volume=51
+ |issue=6
+ |article=
+ |page=
+ |pages=580-3
+ |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jpc.12825
+ |archived=
+ |quote=Most Australian states withdrew circumcision from the range of free services provided in public hospitals through Medicare funding system.
+ |pubmedID=25683279
+ |pubmedCID=
+ |DOI=10.1111/jpc.12825
+ |accessdate=2024-09-16
+}}</ref>
-As a consequence, it appears that the efforts of the [[RACP]] to revitalize the circumcision industry in Australia<ref name="RACP2022" /> may have scant success. The incidence of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys recently has been variously reported to be 4-10 percent.
+As a consequence, it appears that the efforts of the [[RACP]] to revitalize the [[circumcision industry]] in Australia<ref name="RACP2022" /> may have scant success. The incidence of non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of boys recently has been variously reported to be 4-10 percent.
 ==Parental information==