Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m →Review of the circumcision literature: spelling. |
||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
Bossio et al. made three recommendations: | Bossio et al. made three recommendations: | ||
# That more | # That more rigorous and consistent methodology be used. | ||
# Empirically rigorous studies of the physiological effects of neonatal circumcision are needed. | # Empirically rigorous studies of the physiological effects of neonatal [[circumcision]] are needed. | ||
# Psychosocial factors, including [[Sexual effects of circumcision| sexual correlates of circumcision]], should be studied.<ref name="bossio2014" /> | # Psychosocial factors, including [[Sexual effects of circumcision| sexual correlates of circumcision]], should be studied.<ref name="bossio2014" /> | ||