Jennifer A. Bossio: Difference between revisions

Add citation.
Add text and citation.
Line 150: Line 150:
  |accessdate=2024-12-15
  |accessdate=2024-12-15
}}
}}
 
==Critical commentary==
Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."<ref>{{REFjournal
|last=Bossio
|first=
|init=JA
|author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio
|last2=Pukall
|first2=
|init2=CF
|author2-link=
|last3=Steele
|first3=
|init3=SS
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=J Urol
|location=
|date=2016-06
|volume=195
|issue=6
|pages=1848-53
|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/
|archived=
|quote=The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites
|pubmedID=26724395
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080
|accessdate=2024-12-15
}}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]