|
|
| Line 211: |
Line 211: |
| |DOI=10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022 | | |DOI=10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.06.022 |
| |accessdate=2026-03-19 | | |accessdate=2026-03-19 |
| }}</ref> <ref name="andersen2025">{{REFjournal | | }}</ref> <ref name="andersen2025" /> Boys are unable to grant consent due to their immaturity. Parental surrrogates must protect the interest and rights of the child patient. They are limited to granting [[surrogate consent]] for diagnosis and treatment of disease. There is no person who is empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] of a minor.<ref name="hill2002">{{REFjournal |
| |last=Andersen-Giberson
| |
| |init=D
| |
| |author-link=Dale Andersen
| |
| |url=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
| |
| |title=Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework
| |
| |journal=Critical Disability Discourses
| |
| |date=2025-12
| |
| |volume=10
| |
| |issue=2
| |
| |pages=1-37
| |
| |URL=https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/39786/36016
| |
| |DOI=https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.39786
| |
| |quote=In a critical disability studies framework, it is argued that the act of amputating healthy erogenous tissue and the consequences of that amputation cause disability, particularly from a counter-hegemonic lens.
| |
| |format=PDF
| |
| |accessdate=2026-03-14
| |
| }}</ref> Boys are unable to grant consent due to their immaturity. Parental surrrogates must protect the interest and rights of the child patient. They are limited to granting [[surrogate consent]] for diagnosis and treatment of disease. There is no person who is empowered to grant consent for non-therapeutic [[amputation]] of the [[foreskin]] of a minor.<ref name="hill2002">{{REFjournal
| |
| |last=Hill | | |last=Hill |
| |first= | | |first= |