Arguments pro circumcision: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m added section: Pseudo-parental rights arguments |
||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
|accessdate=2019-10-18 | |accessdate=2019-10-18 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
== Pseudo-parental rights arguments == | |||
* '''"I have given birth to my boy, so he is my property."''' | |||
*: No, he is not. Simple as that. People own equal rights just from their birth onwards. No person is property of another person. Slavery has been abandoned a long time ago. This is 21st century. | |||
* '''"I am his mother/father. My parental rights allow me to decide whatever I want for my child."''' | |||
*: No, you may have misunderstood parental rights. Basically, parental rights protect children from indoctrination by the state, giving the parents far-reaching rights in education. But first of all, parenting and education means keeping harm off of a child. The state has a permanent responsibility to ensure that parents do no harm to their children. | |||
== Hygienical arguments == | == Hygienical arguments == | ||