Australia: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Add conclusion of legal section
Line 230: Line 230:
  |first4=Neville
  |first4=Neville
  |author4-link=
  |author4-link=
|last5=
|first5=
|author5-link=
|last6=
|first6=
|author6-link=
|last7=
|first7=
|author7-link=
|last8=
|first8=
|author8-link=
|last9=
|first9=
|author9-link=
  |etal=no
  |etal=no
  |title=Circumcision of Healthy Boys: Criminal Assault?
  |title=Circumcision of Healthy Boys: Criminal Assault?
Line 251: Line 236:
  |journal=J Law Med
  |journal=J Law Med
  |location=
  |location=
  |date=2000
  |date=2000-02
  |volume=7
  |volume=7
  |issue=
  |issue=
Line 264: Line 249:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


 
Despite the criticism in the above referenced papers, there has been no legislative or judicial action to protect boys in Australia from medically-unnecessary non-therapeutic circumcision.


==Circumcision in the 21st Century==
==Circumcision in the 21st Century==