New Zealand: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Adjust percentage |
m adjusted REFbook parameters |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Circumcision in New Zealand == | == Circumcision in New Zealand == | ||
The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary [[circumcision]] in New Zealand among white New Zealanders rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. The decline seems to have been triggered by the publication of [[Douglas Gairdner]]'s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision''<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic medically unnecessary [[circumcision]] in New Zealand among white New Zealanders rose to about 95 percent in the 1940s. The incidence of male neonatal non-therapeutic circumcision started to decline about 1950. The decline seems to have been triggered by the publication of [[Douglas Gairdner]]'s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision''.<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Gairdner | |last=Gairdner | ||
|first=D.M. | |first=D.M. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A | |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_8 A | ||
|work= | |work= | ||
| | |editors=[[George C. Denniston]], [[Frederick M. Hodges]], [[Marilyn Fayre Milos]] | ||
|edition= | |edition= | ||
|volume= | |volume= | ||
|title= | |title=Understanding Circumcision: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to a Multi-Dimensional Problem | ||
|pages=129-146 | |pages=129-146 | ||
|location=New York | |location=New York | ||