Difference between revisions of "Norway"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Nordic view of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.: Add Anne Lindboe.)
(Add text on Council of Europe.)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
  |date=2016-08-30
 
  |date=2016-08-30
 
}}</ref>
 
}}</ref>
 +
 +
 +
==Human rights==
 +
===Council of Europe===
 +
Norway became a founding member of the [[Resolution by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe| Council of Europe]] on 5 May 1949.<ref>{{REFweb
 +
|url=https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/norway
 +
|title=Norway // 47 States, one Europe
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|accessdate=2020-10-04
 +
}}</ref> As a  member of the Council of Europe, Norway is subject to the ''European Convention on Human Rights''<ref>{{REFdocument
 +
|title=European Convention on Human Rights
 +
|url=https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
 +
|contribution=
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|publisher=Council of Europe
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|date=1950
 +
|accessdate=2020-10-04
 +
}}</ref> and is pledged to advance the enumerated rights in its territory. It may be sued in the [https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=homejk European Court of Human Rights] for violations of its duty.
 +
 +
The ''Right to Security of Person'' is provided by Article Five of the ECHR.
 +
 +
Resolution no. 1952 (2013) 'Children's right to physical integrity'<ref name="resolution1952">{{REFdocument
 +
|title=Children's right to physical integrity
 +
|url=http://semantic-pace.net/tools/pdf.aspx?doc=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL1hSZWYvWDJILURXLWV4dHIuYXNwP2ZpbGVpZD0yMDE3NCZsYW5nPUVO&xsl=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL3hzbC1mby9QZGYvWFJlZi1XRC1BVC1YTUwyUERGLnhzbA==&xsltparams=ZmlsZWlkPTIwMTc0
 +
|contribution=
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|publisher=Parliamentary Assembly
 +
|format=PDF
 +
|date=2013-10-01
 +
|accessdate=2020-11-05
 +
}}</ref> of the Parliament Assembly of the Council of Europe, which includes the issue of physical integrity of intersex children for the first time, was adopted on October 1, 2013 following an initiative of the German SPD politician [[Marlene Rupprecht]].<ref name="aktor2016">{{REFbook
 +
|last=Aktor
 +
|first=Mikael
 +
|author-link=Mikael Aktor
 +
|last2=
 +
|first2=
 +
|author2-link=
 +
|year=2016
 +
|title=Whose Rights? The Danish Debate on Ritual Infant Male Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue
 +
|url=https://www.academia.edu/22644864
 +
|work=Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion: In Celebration of Tim Jensen's 65th Birthday
 +
|editor=Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, Mikael Rothstein
 +
|edition=
 +
|volume=
 +
|chapter=24
 +
|pages=311-24
 +
|location=Sheffield
 +
|publisher=Equinox Publishing
 +
|isbn=9781781791394
 +
|quote=
 +
|accessdate=2021-01-18
 +
|note=
 +
}}</ref>
 +
 +
The resolution includes other topics such as [[FGM|female genital mutilation]], [[MGM|male circumcision]] for religious reasons, and submission or coercion of a child to piercings, tattoos or cosmetic surgery.
 +
 +
The resolution calls on all member States to "''examine the prevalence of different categories of non-medically justified operations and interventions impacting on the physical integrity of children in their respective countries, as well as the specific practices related to them, and to carefully consider them in light of the best interests of the child in order to define specific lines of action for each of them; initiate focused awareness-raising measures for each of these categories of violation of the physical integrity of children, to be carried out in the specific contexts where information may best be conveyed to families, such as the medical sector (hospitals and individual practitioners), schools, religious communities or service providers; [...].''"
 +
 +
This first resolution of its kind by a European institution is not legally binding, but an important signal for further debate and action. It shifts the approach of the point of view of the topic from the current medical domain towards a [[human rights]] approach and identifies the right to bodily integrity, autonomy and self-determination. It calls the for the end of non-therapeutic cosmetic medical and surgical interventions.
  
 
==Recent developments==
 
==Recent developments==

Revision as of 19:37, 14 February 2021

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Norway is a constitutional monarchy.

Nordic view of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys.

Norway is a Nordic nation in Northern Europe. Like other Nordic nations, the people abhor child circumcision.

In 2013, children's ombudsmen from Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland, along with the Chair of the Danish Children's Council and the children's spokesperson for Greenland, passed a resolution that emphasized the decision to be circumcised should belong to the individual, who should be able to give informed consent.[1] Anne Lindboe, a paediatrician, is the Children's Ombudsman for Norway. Lindboe believes that boys should decide for themselves if they wish to be circumcised.[2]

The Nordic Association of Clinical Sexologists (2013) supports the position of the Nordic Association of Ombudsmen who reason that circumcision violates the individual's human rights by denying the male child his ability to make the decision for himself.[3]

The medical doctors at Sørland Hospital in Kristiansand, Southern Norway have all refused to perform circumcisions on boys, citing reasons of conscience.[4]


Human rights

Council of Europe

Norway became a founding member of the Council of Europe on 5 May 1949.[5] As a member of the Council of Europe, Norway is subject to the European Convention on Human Rights[6] and is pledged to advance the enumerated rights in its territory. It may be sued in the European Court of Human Rights for violations of its duty.

The Right to Security of Person is provided by Article Five of the ECHR.

Resolution no. 1952 (2013) 'Children's right to physical integrity'[7] of the Parliament Assembly of the Council of Europe, which includes the issue of physical integrity of intersex children for the first time, was adopted on October 1, 2013 following an initiative of the German SPD politician Marlene Rupprecht.[8]

The resolution includes other topics such as female genital mutilation, male circumcision for religious reasons, and submission or coercion of a child to piercings, tattoos or cosmetic surgery.

The resolution calls on all member States to "examine the prevalence of different categories of non-medically justified operations and interventions impacting on the physical integrity of children in their respective countries, as well as the specific practices related to them, and to carefully consider them in light of the best interests of the child in order to define specific lines of action for each of them; initiate focused awareness-raising measures for each of these categories of violation of the physical integrity of children, to be carried out in the specific contexts where information may best be conveyed to families, such as the medical sector (hospitals and individual practitioners), schools, religious communities or service providers; [...]."

This first resolution of its kind by a European institution is not legally binding, but an important signal for further debate and action. It shifts the approach of the point of view of the topic from the current medical domain towards a human rights approach and identifies the right to bodily integrity, autonomy and self-determination. It calls the for the end of non-therapeutic cosmetic medical and surgical interventions.

Recent developments

The Norwegian Health Service (2014) does not provide non-therapeutic male circumcision.[9]

Astrid Grydeland Ersvik, director of the Norwegian Nurses Association, said the association urged the government to ban [non-therapeutic] circumcision of boys under 15-16 years of age.[10]

References

  1. ↑ REFweb Nordic Association of Children's Ombudsmen (30 September 2013). Let the boys decide for themselves. Retrieved 5 October 2020.[] Tuesday, 1 October 2013
  2. ↑ REFweb Anne Lindboe. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  3. ↑ REFdocument Statement on Non-Therapeutic Circumcision of Boys PDF, Nordic Association of Clinical Sexologists. (3 October 2013). Retrieved 5 October 2020.
  4. ↑ REFnews Faull, Solrun F. (30 August 2016)."Hospital doctors in Southern Norway will not circumcise boys".
  5. ↑ REFweb Norway // 47 States, one Europe. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  6. ↑ REFdocument European Convention on Human Rights PDF, Council of Europe. (1950). Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  7. ↑ REFdocument Children's right to physical integrity PDF, Parliamentary Assembly. (1 October 2013). Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  8. ↑ REFbook Aktor, Mikael (2016): 24, in: Whose Rights? The Danish Debate on Ritual Infant Male Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue. Work: Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion: In Celebration of Tim Jensen's 65th Birthday. Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, Mikael Rothstein (ed.). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing. Pp. 311-24. ISBN 9781781791394. Retrieved 18 January 2021.
  9. ↑ REFnews (30 April 2014)."Male circumcision row in secular Norway", Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  10. ↑ REFnews (21 March 2014)."Norwegian nurses push to ban ritual circumcision", The Times of Israel. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.intactiwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Norway&oldid=17774"