Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add external link.)
Line 56: Line 56:
 
  |DOI=10.1093/ojls/gqaa001
 
  |DOI=10.1093/ojls/gqaa001
 
  |accessdate=2020-09-08
 
  |accessdate=2020-09-08
 +
}}
 +
 +
* {{REFnews
 +
|title=Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern
 +
|url=https://die-betroffenen.de/blog/aktueller-artikel-im-oxford-journal-of-legal-studies-weibliche-genitalverstummelung-ist-grundsatzlich-falsch-und-nicht-nur-weil-sie-anders-sei-als-praktiken-an-anderen-kindern/
 +
|last=
 +
|first=
 +
|coauthors=
 +
|publisher=Mogis
 +
|website=https://die-betroffenen.de
 +
|date=2020-08-23
 +
|accessdate=2020-09-09
 +
|quote=
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
Category:'... v. ...'
 
Category:'... v. ...'

Revision as of 13:33, 9 September 2020

Construction Site

This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.

 

Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary.



External links



Category:'... v. ...'