Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
| − | '''Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]''' is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir | + | '''Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015]''' is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division. |
Revision as of 13:47, 9 September 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division.
External links
Proudman, Charlotte. Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
Fox, Marie, Thomson, Michael. Bodily Integrity, Embodiment and the Regulation of Parental Choice. Journal of Law and Society. 2017; 44(4): 501-31. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Möller, Kai. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
(23 August 2020)."Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern", https://die-betroffenen.de, Mogis. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
