Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add reference section.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Correct dates.) |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|pubmedCID= | |pubmedCID= | ||
|DOI= | |DOI= | ||
| − | |accessdate=2020-09- | + | |accessdate=2020-09-09 |
}} | }} | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|url=https://academic.oup.com/ojls/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqaa001/5862902 | |url=https://academic.oup.com/ojls/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqaa001/5862902 | ||
|DOI=10.1093/ojls/gqaa001 | |DOI=10.1093/ojls/gqaa001 | ||
| − | |accessdate=2020-09- | + | |accessdate=2020-09-09 |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 9 September 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division.[1]
External links
Proudman, Charlotte. Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
Fox, Marie, Thomson, Michael. Bodily Integrity, Embodiment and the Regulation of Parental Choice. Journal of Law and Society. 2017; 44(4): 501-31. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- Möller, Kai. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
(23 August 2020)."Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern", https://die-betroffenen.de, Mogis. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
.svg){kind=icon}