Difference between revisions of "The social effects of mass circumcision"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Add text.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Wikify.) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| − | The late psychohistorian [[Lloyd deMause]] (1996) identified early trauma, of which infant circumcision is a prominent example, as a cause of "war and social violence".<ref name="demause1996">{{REFjournal | + | The late psychohistorian [[Lloyd deMause]] (1996) identified early [[trauma]], of which infant circumcision is a prominent example, as a cause of "war and social violence".<ref name="demause1996">{{REFjournal |
|last=deMause | |last=deMause | ||
|first=Lloyd | |first=Lloyd | ||
Revision as of 02:25, 15 February 2026
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
The psychological injury of male circumcision has been fairly well explored in recent years, but comparatively little has been done to document the effects on society when nearly all men have suffered child circumcision.
James W. Prescott (1975) believed that circumcision caused sensory deprivation and loss of body pleasure, which he claimed results in high levels of violence.[1]
The late psychohistorian Lloyd deMause (1996) identified early trauma, of which infant circumcision is a prominent example, as a cause of "war and social violence".[2]
Psychologist Ronald Goldman, (2007) devoted an entire chapter to "the impact of circumcision upon American society" in his landmark book, Circumcision, the Hidden Trauma.
See also
References
- ↑
Prescott JW. Body Pleasure and the Origins of Violence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. November 1975; : 10-20. Retrieved 14 February 2026.
- ↑ deMause, Lloyd. Restaging Fetal Traumas in War and Social Violence. Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal. 1996; 23(4): 344-92. PMID. Retrieved 14 February 2026.
