Difference between revisions of "Circumstraint"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Why the Circumstraint is needed: Revise text.)
(Add section; Add link in SEEALSO section.)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[Image:Circumstraint2.jpg|right|thumb|A device used in circumcision ]]
 
[[Image:Circumstraint2.jpg|right|thumb|A device used in circumcision ]]
 +
==Description==
 +
The Circumstraint is made of molded plastic cut in a rectangular form with indentations for the body of the newborn infant boy to fit into. It is equipped with straps to totally immobilize the infant to prevent any movement whatsoever.
 
==History==
 
==History==
 
Raymond C. Creelman applied for a patent for this device on 14 December 1953. The patent was granted on 19 June 1956. The patent expired on 19 June 1973.<ref>{{REFweb
 
Raymond C. Creelman applied for a patent for this device on 14 December 1953. The patent was granted on 19 June 1956. The patent expired on 19 June 1973.<ref>{{REFweb
Line 153: Line 155:
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
* [[Pain]]
 
* [[Pain]]
 +
* [[Trauma]]
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
 
* {{REFweb
 
* {{REFweb

Revision as of 03:46, 15 July 2023

A device used in circumcision

A Circumstraint is an immobilization device for infant non-therapeutic circumcision. Circumstraint stands for Circumcision Restraint.

A device used in circumcision

Description

The Circumstraint is made of molded plastic cut in a rectangular form with indentations for the body of the newborn infant boy to fit into. It is equipped with straps to totally immobilize the infant to prevent any movement whatsoever.

History

Raymond C. Creelman applied for a patent for this device on 14 December 1953. The patent was granted on 19 June 1956. The patent expired on 19 June 1973.[1]

The device was formerly manufactured by Olympic in Washington. It is now manufactured by Natus Medical and retails for $654.00.[2] The manufacturer claims that more than 11,000 have been sold.

Why the Circumstraint is needed

When the Circumstraint was introduced medical doctors absurdly and bizarrely believed that newborn infants could not feel pain.[3] Circumcisions were carried out without any kind of pain relief, analgesia, or sedation. The surgical amputation of the highly sensitive foreskin was done with a wide awake non-anesthetized infant, who would do his best to escape from the intense pain of amputative surgery, so a restraint device was needed so that no greater physical injury was done to the infant than the intended injury of foreskin amputation.

It is now known that infant boys feel pain fully and more intensely than adults.[4] It is dangerous to give infants general anesthesia, so the only possible pain relief is local nerve block, which is now recommended if a circumcision is to be done. These are of doubtful efficacy because of multiple nerve pathways in the penis, so baby boys still kick and scream, making the Circumstraint still necessary if a circumcision is to be done. Parents are reminded that infant circumcision is an unnecessary, non-therapeutic surgical amputation that does not cure or prevent disease and may permanently harm infant boys by loss of the protective, immunological, sexual, and sensory functions of his foreskin.[5]

Video



Quotes

From the manufacturer:

Struggling infant
In less than 30 seconds a nurse can immobilize a struggling infant...[6]
Escape
He's held safely and securely without danger of escape.[6]
Perfectedly presenting
Circumstraint's comfortable contoured shape positions the infant, hips elevated, perfectly presenting the genitalia.[6]

Medieval torture device


Circumstraint MichaelSGreen.jpg

See also

External links

References

  1. REFweb Surgical operating table for small infants, Google. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  2. REFweb Natus Medical 50100 — Circumstraint Infant, Central Infusion Alliance. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  3. REFjournal Cope DK. Neonatal pain: the evolution of an idea.. The American Association of Anesthesiologists Newsletter. September 1998; Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  4. REFjournal Anand KJS, Hickey PR, et al. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med. 19 November 1987; 317(21): 1321-9. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  5. REFjournal Uberoi M, Abdulcadir J, Ohl DA, et al. Potentially under-recognized late-stage physical and psychosexual complications of non-therapeutic neonatal penile circumcision: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of self-reports from an online community forum. Int J Impot Res. 23 October 2022; PMID. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  6. a b c Olympic Circumstraint — Infant Immobilizer