Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Psychological literature about male circumcision

489 bytes added, Tuesday at 19:55
Twenty-first century articles: Add article.
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2024-06-24
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Narvaez
|init=DF
|author-link=Darcia Narvaez
|url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
|title=Circumcision’s Psychological Damage
|journal=Psychology Today
|date=2015-01-11
|volume=
|issue=
|pages=
|quote=The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent”.
|accessdate=2024-06-28
}}
* {{REFjournal
|quote=Medical doctors adopted male circumcision from religious practice into medical practice in England in the 1860s and in the United States in the 1870s. No thought was given to the possible behavioral effects of painful operations that excise important protective erogenous tissue from the male phallus.
|accessdate=2024-06-28
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Boyle
|first=
|init=GJ
|author-link=Gregory J. Boyle
|etal=no
|title=Circumcision of Infants and Children: Short-Term Trauma and Long-Term Psychosexual Harm
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Advances in Sexual Medicine
|location=
|date=2015-04-16
|volume=5
|issue=2
|article=55727
|page=
|pages=
|url=https://www.scirp.org/html/3-1990071_55727.htm
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.4236/asm.2015.52004
|accessdate=2024-07-02
}}
* {{REFjournal
|accessdate=2024-06-22
}}
* {{REFjournal |last=Narvaez |init=DF |author-link=Darcia Narvaez |url=https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage |title=Circumcision’s Psychological Damage |journal=Psychology Today |date=2015-01-11 |volume= |issue= |pages= |quote=The control group babies were in so much pain—some began choking and one even had a seizure—they decided it was unethical to continue. It is important to also consider the effects of post-operative pain in circumcised infants (regardless of whether anesthesia is used), which is described as “severe” and “persistent”. |accessdate=2024-06-28}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Narvaez
16,072
edits

Navigation menu