Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arguments pro circumcision

463 bytes added, 08:31, 9 January 2020
m
added first pseudo-legal argument
|accessdate=2019-10-18
}}</ref>
 
== Pseudo-legal arguments ==
* '''"Male circumcision is legal, it has been done for many, many years."'''
*: Many parents argue that foreskin amputation in young boys is legal because it has been done for many years, centuries, or even millennia. Modern case law makes it clear that tradition does not create a legal claim. Other violations of human rights such as rape, stoning, slavery, etc. have also been done for a long time - which does not legalize them.
== Pseudo-parental rights arguments ==
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,328
edits

Navigation menu