16,701
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|last2= |first2= |author2-link= |last3= |first3= |author3-link= |last4= |first4= |author4-link= |last5= |first5= |author5-link= |last6= |first6= |author6-link= |last7= |first7= |author7-link= |last8= |first8= |author8-link= |last9= |first9= |author9-link= |etal=yesno
→Questioning the Abrahamic Covenant: Improve citation.
Many have wondered why God would create men with a [[foreskin]] with documented protective, immunological, sensory, and sexual [[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| physiological functions]] only to require that it be cut off after eight days of life.
Some contemporary Jewish parents feel that [[circumcision]] is a painful amputation that inflicts pain, physical, [[Sexual effects of circumcision| sexual]], and [[Psychological issues of male circumcision| psychological]] harm to a child. They wish to protect a son from such harm and so have adopted a peaceful, non-cutting naming ceremony usually called [[Brit Shalom]] instead of the traditional [[Brit Milah]]. Goodman (1999) has called for an end to ritual cutting.<ref name="goodman1999">{{REFjournal
|last=Goodman
|first=Jenny
|author-link=
|title=Jewish circumcision: an alternative perspective
|trans-title=
|volume=83 Suppl 1
|issue=
|pages=22-7
|url=https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1022.x
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=10349411
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1022.x
|accessdate=2020-04-08
}}</ref>
==Debunking the Abrahamic Covenant==