Difference between revisions of "Boldt v. Boldt"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add to External links.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Construction Site}} | ||
+ | |||
'''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy. | '''Boldt v. Boldt''' is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy. | ||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
|accessdate=2020-04-18 | |accessdate=2020-04-18 | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * {{REFnews | ||
+ | |title=Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says | ||
+ | |url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/law/01/25/circumcision.case/index.html | ||
+ | |last= | ||
+ | |first= | ||
+ | |coauthors= | ||
+ | |publisher=CNN | ||
+ | |website= | ||
+ | |date=2008-01-25 | ||
+ | |accessdate=2020-04-19 | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * {{REFjournal | ||
+ | |last=Diekema | ||
+ | |first=Doug | ||
+ | |author-link= | ||
+ | |etal=no | ||
+ | |title=Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective | ||
+ | |trans-title= | ||
+ | |language= | ||
+ | |journal=J Clin Ethics | ||
+ | |location= | ||
+ | |date=2009-09 | ||
+ | |volume=20 | ||
+ | |issue=3 | ||
+ | |pages=251-7 | ||
+ | |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19845198 | ||
+ | |archived= | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | |pubmedID=19845198 | ||
+ | |pubmedCID= | ||
+ | |DOI= | ||
+ | |accessdate=2020-04-19 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * {{REFjournal | ||
+ | |last=Geisheker | ||
+ | |first=John V. | ||
+ | |author-link=John V. Geisheker | ||
+ | |etal=no | ||
+ | |title=Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Defending the child's right to an open future | ||
+ | |trans-title= | ||
+ | |language= | ||
+ | |journal=J Clin Ethics | ||
+ | |location= | ||
+ | |date=2010-03 | ||
+ | |volume=21 | ||
+ | |issue=1 | ||
+ | |pages=86-88 | ||
+ | |url=http://www.circinfo.org/DOC_Boldt_case.html | ||
+ | |archived= | ||
+ | |quote= | ||
+ | |pubmedID=20465080 | ||
+ | |pubmedCID= | ||
+ | |DOI= | ||
+ | |accessdate=2020-04-19 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * {{REFdocument | ||
+ | |title=Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714) | ||
+ | |url= https://law.justia.com/cases/oregon/supreme-court/2008/s054714.html | ||
+ | |contribution= | ||
+ | |last= | ||
+ | |first= | ||
+ | |publisher=Oregon Supreme Court | ||
+ | |format= | ||
+ | |date=2008-01-25 | ||
+ | |accessdate=2020-04-19 | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 14:25, 19 April 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Boldt v. Boldt is formally a child custody case from the state of Oregon, however it actually is about the proposed circumcision of a boy.
External links
- Geisheker, John.
American legal precedent confirms child’s right to reject circumcision
. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- (25 January 2008)."Ask boy, 12, if he wants to be circumcised, court says", CNN. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Diekema, Doug. Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective. J Clin Ethics. September 2009; 20(3): 251-7. PMID. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Geisheker, John V.. Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Defending the child's right to an open future. J Clin Ethics. March 2010; 21(1): 86-88. PMID. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Boldt and Boldt, (CC No. 98-2318-D(3); CA A126175; SC S054714), Oregon Supreme Court. (25 January 2008). Retrieved 19 April 2020.
Category:USA
Category:Litigation over circumcision
Category:Jurisprudence