Difference between revisions of "Indiana - Wrongful circumcision"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text. Remove Construction Site template.)
m (remove extra blank lines)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{{LINKS}}
 
{{LINKS}}
 
 
* [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy]
 
* [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy]
  
 
<!-- {{REF}} -->
 
<!-- {{REF}} -->
 
 
[[Category:Litigation]]
 
[[Category:Litigation]]
 
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
 
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]]
  
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
 
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]

Revision as of 08:34, 7 July 2020

In a 2003 Indiana wrongful circumcision case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.

External links