Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

680 bytes added, 01:30, 1 August 2020
Non-US statements: Add CUA paper.
The [http://www.cua.org/en Canadian Urological Association] (2018) issued a 19-page guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision. The statement is very comprehensive and covers treatment of various diseases and deformities as well as discussing non-therapeutic circumicision of boys in Canada.
 
* {{REFjournal
|last=Dave
|first=Sumit
|author-link=
|last2=Afshar
|first2=Kourash
|author2-link=
|last3=Braga
|first3=Luis
|author3-link=
|last4=Anderson
|first4=Peter
|author4-link=
|etal=no
|title=Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version)
|trans-title=
|language=English
|journal= Can Urol Assoc J
|location=
|date=2018-02
|volume=12
|issue=2
|pages=E76-99
|url=http://www.cua.org/themes/web/assets/files/g49_en_circumcision-new_logo_am.pdf
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=29381458
|pubmedCID=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5937400/
|DOI=/10.5489/cuaj.5033
|
31
}}
|website=www.bma.org.uk
|date=2019
|accessdate=2020-07-30
|format=PDF
|quote=
15,755
edits

Navigation menu