Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add judge.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|accessdate=2020-09-08 | |accessdate=2020-09-08 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
* {{REFnews | * {{REFnews | ||
| Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | Category:'... v. ...' | + | [[Category:'... v. ...']] |
Revision as of 12:44, 9 September 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir Peter Munby.
External links
Proudman, Charlotte. Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
Fox, Marie, Thomson, Michael. Bodily Integrity, Embodiment and the Regulation of Parental Choice. Journal of Law and Society. 2017; 44(4): 501-31. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- Möller, Kai. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
(23 August 2020)."Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern", https://die-betroffenen.de, Mogis. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
