Difference between revisions of "Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Wikify Christopher P Price.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and reference.) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|date=2015-01-14 | |date=2015-01-14 | ||
|accessdate=2020-09-09 | |accessdate=2020-09-09 | ||
− | }}</ref> Munby may have read the Brief to the Law Commission of England and Wales by [[Christopher P Price]] entitled ''Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront'',<ref name="price1996">{{REFweb | + | }}</ref> Munby may have read the Brief to the Law Commission of England and Wales by [[Christopher P. Price]] entitled ''Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront'',<ref name="price1996">{{REFweb |
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/ | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/price-uklc/ | ||
|archived= | |archived= | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
A girl of African-Muslim ancestry reportedly was abandoned on the streets of the city of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds Leeds], West Yorkshire. This resulted in the girl, designated as "G" and her brother, designated as "B" being taken into custody and placed with a foster parent.<ref name="bangham2015" /> | A girl of African-Muslim ancestry reportedly was abandoned on the streets of the city of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds Leeds], West Yorkshire. This resulted in the girl, designated as "G" and her brother, designated as "B" being taken into custody and placed with a foster parent.<ref name="bangham2015" /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This case was brought by the local authority due to their being concerns that G had received a female circumcision.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
+ | |url=https://www.charlotteproudman.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Re-B-and-G.Fam_.Law_.pdf | ||
+ | |title=Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G | ||
+ | |last=Proudman | ||
+ | |first=Charlotte | ||
+ | |accessdate=2020-09-09 | ||
+ | }}</ref> | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} |
Revision as of 10:54, 12 September 2020
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Re B and G (Children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3, [2015] is a British family law case which has attracted considerable legal commentary. The judge was Sir James Munby (born 27 July 1948), President of the Family Division and former Chairman of the Law Commission for England and Wales.[1] Munby may have read the Brief to the Law Commission of England and Wales by Christopher P. Price entitled Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront,[2] since he later cited the published version.
A girl of African-Muslim ancestry reportedly was abandoned on the streets of the city of Leeds, West Yorkshire. This resulted in the girl, designated as "G" and her brother, designated as "B" being taken into custody and placed with a foster parent.[1]
This case was brought by the local authority due to their being concerns that G had received a female circumcision.[3]
External links
- Proudman, Charlotte.
Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- Fox, Marie, Thomson, Michael. Bodily Integrity, Embodiment and the Regulation of Parental Choice. Journal of Law and Society. 2017; 44(4): 501-31. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- Möller, Kai. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- (23 August 2020)."Aktueller Artikel im Oxford Journal of Legal Studies: Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung ist grundsätzlich falsch, und nicht nur, weil sie „anders“ sei als Praktiken an anderen Kindern", https://die-betroffenen.de, Mogis. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
References
- ↑ a b Bangham, Samantha: Judgment, Family Law. (14 January 2015). Retrieved 9 September 2020.
- ↑ Price, Christopher (1996).
Male Circumcision: A Legal Affront
. Retrieved 12 September 2020. - ↑ Proudman, Charlotte.
Female Genital Mutilation: Re B and G
. Retrieved 9 September 2020.