Difference between revisions of "Stephen Moreton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (add CHP) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|date=2019-09-13 | |date=2019-09-13 | ||
|accessdate=2019-09-13 | |accessdate=2019-09-13 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a 2020 web debate he accused all [[intactivists]] of spreading lies about [[circumcision]]. He uses to mix up and repeatedly spread all kinds of [[arguments pro circumcision]] although they have been refuted and debunked.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
| + | |url=https://cphpost.dk/?p=118305 | ||
| + | |title=Denmark refuses to ban the ritual circumcision of boys | ||
| + | |publisher=Copenhagen Post | ||
| + | |date=2020-09-11 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2020-09-12 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 12 September 2020
Stephen Moreton, Ph.D., is a chemist who specialises in critically examining anti-circumcision claims. He edits and writes for http://www.circfacts.org.[1]
In a 2020 web debate he accused all intactivists of spreading lies about circumcision. He uses to mix up and repeatedly spread all kinds of arguments pro circumcision although they have been refuted and debunked.[2]
External links
References
- ↑
(13 September 2019). Male circumcision opposition supported by poor evidence, paper finds
, University of Sidney. Retrieved 13 September 2019. - ↑ (11 September 2020).
Denmark refuses to ban the ritual circumcision of boys
, Copenhagen Post. Retrieved 12 September 2020.
