Difference between revisions of "American Academy of Pediatrics"
(External links and References swapped) |
(International protests) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
After the release of the position statement, a debate appeared in the journal ''Pediatrics'' and the ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' between the AAP and an ad-hoc group of Western doctors, ethicists and lawyers, who questioned the evidence and ethics of the AAP position statement, and accused the AAP of "cultural bias". The AAP received further criticism from activist groups that oppose [[circumcision]]."<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Academy_of_Pediatrics</ref></blockquote> | After the release of the position statement, a debate appeared in the journal ''Pediatrics'' and the ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' between the AAP and an ad-hoc group of Western doctors, ethicists and lawyers, who questioned the evidence and ethics of the AAP position statement, and accused the AAP of "cultural bias". The AAP received further criticism from activist groups that oppose [[circumcision]]."<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Academy_of_Pediatrics</ref></blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == International protests== | ||
| + | In 2013, international physicians protest against American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy on infant male circumcision. This protest was organized by [[Morten Frisch]] and led to an article in ''Pediatics today''<ref>[http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=62e174e8-613e-4d79-910f-747708dbf27a&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=129611 Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision. Pediatrics 2013 131 (4) (PDF)]</ref>, signed by an international group of 38 physicians from 16 European countries. | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 2 June 2015
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is an American professional association of pediatricians, headquartered in Elk Grove Village, Illinois. Their slogan is: "Dedicated to the Health of All Children." Almost all US pediatricians are members.
From the Wikipedia:
"In a 2012 position statement, the academy stated that a systematic evaluation of the medical literature shows that the "preventive health benefits of elective circumcision of male newborns outweigh the risks of the procedure" and that the health benefits "are sufficient to justify access to this procedure for families choosing it and to warrant third-party payment for circumcision of male newborns," but "are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns". The academy takes the position that parents should make the final decision about circumcision, after appropriate information is gathered about the risks and benefits of the procedure. The 2012 statement is a shift in the academy's position from its 1999 statement in that the academy says the health benefits of the procedure outweigh the risks, and supports having the procedure covered by insurance.
After the release of the position statement, a debate appeared in the journal Pediatrics and the Journal of Medical Ethics between the AAP and an ad-hoc group of Western doctors, ethicists and lawyers, who questioned the evidence and ethics of the AAP position statement, and accused the AAP of "cultural bias". The AAP received further criticism from activist groups that oppose circumcision."[1]
International protests
In 2013, international physicians protest against American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy on infant male circumcision. This protest was organized by Morten Frisch and led to an article in Pediatics today[2], signed by an international group of 38 physicians from 16 European countries.
External links
- AAP.org - American Academy of Pediatrics (Official Website)