Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Circumcision study flaws

6 bytes added, 17:12, 24 November 2021
m
wikify HIV
=== Australasia ===
The [https://www.racp.edu.au Royal Australasian College of Physicians] (2010) released a 28-page updated position statement on non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in September 2010. This statement is deeply flawed and outmoded in 2020. It seems to be designed to protect the physicians' income from performing non-therapeutic circumcision. The statement accepts at face value the false, now disproved,<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> claims that circumcision reduces the risk of [[HIV ]] by 60 percent. The statement shows only limited understanding of the functions of the foreskin. While it recognizes the protective function, it does not recognize the immunological function or sexual function, and shows only limited understanding of the erogenous function. The RACP places parental preference above child human rights. Nevertheless, public hospitals in [[Australia]] have banned performance of non-therapeutic circumcisions<ref>{{REFnews
|title=Cosmetic circumcision banned
|url=http://www.cirp.org/news/theadvertiser2007-11-12/
=== Canada ===
The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] (2015) issued a new statement regarding non-therapeutic circumcision of boys. This statement was prompted by the three seriously flawed [[HIV ]] studies of adult males in Africa, that have now been disproved,<ref name="boyle-hill2011"/> and caused the retirement of the excellent previous 1996 statement.<ref name="cps1996">{{REFjournal
|last=Outerbridge
|first=Eugene
{{SEEALSO}}
 
* [[Financial incentive]]
* [[Position statements on infant circumcision]]
{{REF}}
 
[[Category:Literature]]
[[Category:From Intactipedia]]
[[Category:From IntactWiki]]
administrator, administrators, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
22,244
edits

Navigation menu