Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Create page.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add SEEALSO section.) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|accessdate=2022-02-04 | |accessdate=2022-02-04 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | * [[Unsatisfactory cosmetic results including uncircumcised appearance]] | ||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 4 February 2022
Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]
See also
References
- ↑
Fekete, Ferenc, Török, Alexander, Nyirády, Peter. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
