Difference between revisions of "Redundant foreskin"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add SEEALSO section.)
m (adjust REF)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
  |last=Fekete
 
  |last=Fekete
 
  |first=Ferenc
 
  |first=Ferenc
  |init=
+
  |init=F
 
  |author-link=
 
  |author-link=
 
  |last2=Török
 
  |last2=Török
 
  |first2=Alexander
 
  |first2=Alexander
  |init2=
+
  |init2=A
 
  |author2-link=
 
  |author2-link=
 
  |last3=Nyirády
 
  |last3=Nyirády
 
  |first3=Peter
 
  |first3=Peter
  |init3=
+
  |init3=P
 
  |author3-link=
 
  |author3-link=
 
  |etal=no
 
  |etal=no
 
  |title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions
 
  |title=Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions
|trans-title=
 
|language=
 
 
  |journal=Int Urol Nephrol
 
  |journal=Int Urol Nephrol
 
  |location=
 
  |location=
Line 37: Line 35:
  
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
 
  
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]
 
[[Category:Circumcision complication]]

Revision as of 15:29, 4 February 2022

Insufficient foreskin removal/redundant foreskin is classed technically as a complication. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected circumcised appearance has not been achieved. There are no health issues from insufficient foreskin removal. A circumcision revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.[1]

See also

References

  1. REFjournal Fekete F, Török A, Nyirády P. Revisions after unsatisfactory adult circumcisions. Int Urol Nephrol. June 2011; 43(2): 431-5. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 4 February 2022.