Difference between revisions of "Aaron Tobian"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add text and citations.)
(using Template:Population-based studies)
Line 52: Line 52:
 
  |accessdate=2021-07-30
 
  |accessdate=2021-07-30
 
}}</ref>  
 
}}</ref>  
==Population-based studies==
 
  
September 2021 saw the publication of two huge population studies on the relationship of [[circumcision]] and HIV infection:
+
== Population-based studies ==
 
+
{{Population-based studies}}
# Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, [[Canada]] (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were [[circumcised]] between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of HIV infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
 
|last=Mayan
 
|first=Madhur
 
|init=M
 
|author-link=
 
|last2=Hamilton
 
|first2=Robert J.
 
|init2=RJ
 
|author2-link=
 
|last3=Juurlink
 
|first3=David N.
 
|init3=DN
 
|author3-link=
 
|last4=Austin
 
|first4=Peter C.
 
|init4=PC
 
|author4-link=
 
|last5=Jarvi
 
|first5=Keith A.
 
|init5=KA
 
|author5-link=
 
|etal=no
 
|title=Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada
 
|journal=J Urol
 
|date=2021-09-23
 
|url=https://www.auajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
 
|quote=We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
 
|pubmedID=34551593
 
|DOI=10.1097/JU.0000000000002234
 
|accessdate=2021-10-02
 
}}</ref>
 
# [[Morten Frisch]] & Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in [[Denmark]] of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that [[circumcised]] men have a higher rate of STI and HIV infection overall than [[intact]] men.<ref name="frisch2021">{{FrischM SimonsenJ 2021}}</ref>
 
 
 
No association between lack of circumcision and risk of HIV infection was found by either study.
 
  
 
{{SEEALSO}}
 
{{SEEALSO}}

Revision as of 13:21, 21 August 2022

Tobin.jpg
Pathology Dep.
Johns Hopkins
Benefactors:
Ronald Gray
Maria Wawer
Thomas C. Quinn

Aaron A.R. Tobian, M.D.[a 1], Ph.D.[a 2], is Assistant Professor of Pathology for the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health.[1] He has a son he claims he circumcised on the basis of the 3 African trials.[2] He is supported by grant 2011036 from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, National Institutes of Health grant 1K23AI093152-01A1, and the Johns Hopkins University Clinician Scientist Development Award.[3]

Population-based studies

September 2021 saw the publication of two huge population studies on the relationship of circumcision and HIV infection:

  1. Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, Canada (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of HIV infection.[4]
  2. Morten Frisch & Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in Denmark of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that circumcised men have a higher rate of STI and HIV infection overall than intact men.[5]

No association between lack of circumcision and risk of HIV infection was found by either study. There now is credible evidence that the massive, expensive African circumcision programs have not been effective in preventing HIV infection.

See also

Abbreviations

  1. REFweb Doctor of Medicine, Wikipedia. Retrieved 14 June 2021. In the United Kingdom, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, the abbreviation MD is common.
  2. REFweb Doctor of Philosophy, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)

References

  1. REFweb Tobian, Aaron. Aaron Tobian: Bio and publications. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
  2. REFweb Elizabeth Cohen, CNN Senior Medical Correspondent. Should teens make circumcision decision?. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
  3. REFjournal Tobian AAR, Gray RH. The Medical Benefits of Male Circumcision. Journal of the American Medical Association Med. 5 October 2011; 306(13): 1479-1480. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
  4. REFjournal Mayan M, Hamilton RJ, Juurlink DN, Austin PC, Jarvi KA. Circumcision and Risk of HIV Among Males From Ontario, Canada. J Urol. 23 September 2021; PMID. DOI. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
    Quote: We found that circumcision was not independently associated with the risk of acquiring HIV among men from Ontario, Canada.
  5. REFjournal Frisch M, Simonsen J. Non-therapeutic male circumcision in infancy or childhood and risk of human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections: national cohort study in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 26 September 2021; 37: 251–9. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 16 January 2022.