Difference between revisions of "Indiana - Wrongful circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add SEEALSO section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded. |
| + | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Foreskin#Physiological_functions| Physiological functions of the foreskin]] | ||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
| − | * http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html | + | * [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy] |
<!-- {{REF}} --> | <!-- {{REF}} --> | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Litigation]] | [[Category:Litigation]] | ||
[[Category:Litigation over circumcision]] | [[Category:Litigation over circumcision]] | ||
[[Category:From IntactWiki]] | [[Category:From IntactWiki]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:44, 15 September 2022
In a 2003 Indiana wrongful circumcision case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.
See also
Physiological functions of the foreskin