Difference between revisions of "Dena S. Davis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
| − | Professor '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''', B.A., J.D., Ph.D., | + | Professor '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''', B.A., J.D., Ph.D., of [https://www1.lehigh.edu/home Lehigh University] is a leading bioethicist. She has taken an interest in medically-non-indicated genital cutting of children and has written about [[Boldt v. Boldt]]. |
Professor Davis believes: | Professor Davis believes: | ||
| − | * Just because we can do something | + | * Just because we can do something does not mean that we should do it. |
* Children have a right to an open future. | * Children have a right to an open future. | ||
Revision as of 02:04, 1 May 2023
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Professor Dena S. Davis, B.A., J.D., Ph.D., of Lehigh University is a leading bioethicist. She has taken an interest in medically-non-indicated genital cutting of children and has written about Boldt v. Boldt.
Professor Davis believes:
- Just because we can do something does not mean that we should do it.
- Children have a right to an open future.
Curriculum Vitae: https://religion.cas.lehigh.edu/sites/religion.cas2.lehigh.edu/files/Dena_Davis_Resume.pdf
Video
Publications
Davis DS. Male and female genital alteration: A collision course with the law.. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine. 2001 (Summer); 11: 487-570. Retrieved 30 April 2023.- Davis DS. Boldt v. Boldt. J Clin Eth. 2009 (Fall); 20(3): 241-3. PMID. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
