Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Position statements on infant circumcision

107 bytes added, 23:42, 13 May 2023
Add link in SEEALSO section.
Perhaps the most shocking fact is that circumcision continues to be practiced in the [[United States]] even though no official western medical organization in the world recommends it. The Royal Dutch Medical Society, The British Medical Association, the Canadian Pediatric Society, and the Royal Australian College of Physicians have all made official policy statements against circumcision.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the [[American Urological Association ]] all do not recommend circumcision, but deceptively claim "potential" benefits. (The word ''potential'' means to exist in possibility, but ''not'' in actuality,<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/potential
|title=Potential
===The trade associations pact===
The circumcision policies of American [[medical trade association| medical trade associations ]] are currently in chaos.
The three trade associations, whose member profit by carrying out non-therapeutic circumcision of boys formed a pact in 2007 to create a circumcision statement that would protect [[third-party payment]] for non-therapeutic circumcision. The three trade associations are:
The [https://www.gmc-uk.org/ General Medical Council] has disciplined several medical doctors who performed male circumcision unethically or improperly.
 
See [[United Kingdom]].
== Australia ==
|accessdate=2020-06-25
}}</ref>
 
See [[Netherlands]]
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Circumcision study flaws]]
* [[Financial incentive]]
{{LINKS}}
15,635
edits

Navigation menu