Changes

==Advocacy of male circumcision== In July 2012, the '''WHO''' (World Health Organization) published a study<ref>[http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/ Male circumcision for HIV prevention]</ref> (just in time for the just then started [[Circumcision Debate]] in Germany) which recommended to perform [[circumcision]]s as a prevention against [[HIV]]/[[AIDS]]. This study supposedly promises a 60% protection against [[AIDS]].

In May 2018, the WHO announced to develop new guidelines on male circumcision, focusing on doing even more male circumcisions as a [[HIV]]/AIS prevention action.<ref>{{REFweb

At least 16 members of the GDG are biased in favor of circumcision, while only 7 members have unclear points of view. Chances are that they are also strongly involved in this topic and take a position in favor of circumcision. The WHO will certainly have deliberately selected and named these experts on circumcision. One can therefore accuse the WHO of bias on this topic. The [[Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus| Director-General]] has so far failed to address the issue of [[bias]] in the CDG.

The World Health Organization (2011) endorses male circumcision as an [[HIV ]] prevention method based on the three RCTs in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda.<ref>{{REFweb

|Text=...male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for [[HIV ]] prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high [[HIV ]] and low male circumcision prevalence.

On their website<ref name="WHO2011"/>, they acknowledge that, even if the latest "studies" were correct, "[m]ale circumcision provides only partial protection," and that it should be part of a "comprehensive [[HIV ]] prevention package" that includes [[HIV ]] testing and counseling services, treatment for STD infections, the promotion of safer sex practices and the provision of condoms and the promotion of their correct and consistent use.

''Note: {{NOTE}} Even if the recent trials were accurate (and their credibility is highly questionable), circumcision could only reduce the relative risk of acquiring [[HIV ]] between circumcised and [[uncircumcised]] men by 60% over a period of about one year.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref> Condoms have an absolute reduction risk of acquiring [[HIV ]] that's over 95% (closer to 100% when used properly), making circumcision a moot point.''

[[David R. Tomlinson]] (2008) is the inventor of the [[AccuCirc]] device for infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFnews

}}</ref> He also wrote a manual on infant circumcision (2011) for the World Health Organization.<ref>{{REFnews

|quote=Dr. David Tomlinson, who teaches family medicine at {{UNI|Brown University |Brown}} in Providence, R.I.{{USSC|RI}}, wrote a manual on infant circumcision for the World Health Organization.

The Department of Reproductive Health and Research (RHR), together with the WHO Department of [[HIV]]/[[AIDS ]] and the Joint United Nations Programme on [[HIV]]/[[AIDS ]] ([[UNAIDS]]), launched a number of new initiatives in 2006–2007.<ref name="for control">{{REFweb

Infant boys are born with a healthy penis and foreskin. Treatment is not required. Infant boys do not engage in sexual intercourse so they cannot contract [[HIV ]] infection by sexual intercourse. Infant boys cannot grant consent for this irreversible body altering surgery which violate several significant United Nations [[human rights]] instruments.

|pages=552-5555

Moreover, the foreskin protects the penis from infection, so the [[amputation ]] of the [[foreskin ]] makes UTI more likely. In infant boys, UTIs originate from the external environment, strongly suggesting that these infections are iatrogenically caused.<ref>{{REFjournal

|pages=598-5999

|pages=235.243-43

|pages=322-3244

|pages=1098-1102102

The [[VMMC Experience Project]] (2019) has published a massive, illustrated, 153-page report on VMMC in Africa for the United Nations.<ref name="fish2019">{{REFdocument

In a letter to Ambassador Deborah L. Birx, {{MD}}, (2020) the head of the United States [[PEPFAR ]] program, [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)| Doctors Opposing Circumcision]] called circumcision ineffective and called for [[PEPFAR ]] to abandon the WHO VMMC program and redirect its funds to anti-retroviral therapy and the provision of condomʂ<ref>{{REFdocument

|publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision(D.O.C.)]]

In a further indication of World Health Organization malfeasance, ZeroHedge reports that polio vaccine provided by the [[Bill and & Melinda Gates Foundation ]] in a WHO sponsored polio vaccination scheme actually causes polio. Sudan, Chad, and Cameroon are reporting outbreaks of polio from Gates vaccine supplied through the WHO initiative.<ref name="durden2020">{{REFnews

== [[CircWatch ]] ==

|trans-title= |language=English |last= |first= |author-link= |publisher=[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision |website=(D.O.C.)]]

}}* {{REFweb |url=https://dailycaller.com/2016/05/31/fraud-corruption-harassment-charges-rise-inside-world-health-organization/ |title=Fraud, Corruption, Harassment Charges Rise Inside World Health Organization |last=Johnson |first=Drew |init= |publisher=Daily Caller |date=2016-12-31 |accessdate=2022-12-26}}* {{REFweb |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/06/world-health-organization-corrupt-wasteful/ |title=Stop Funding WHO Until It Cleans Up Its Act |last=Stier |first=Jeff |init= |publisher=National Review |date=2017-06-14 |accessdate=2022-12-26}}*{{REFweb |url=https://brownstone.org/articles/the-corruption-of-the-world-health-organization/ |title=The Corruption of the World Health Organization |last=Bell |first=David |init= |publisher=Brownstone Institute |date=2022-05-27 |accessdate=2022-12-26}}*{{REFweb |url=https://nworeport.me/2022/08/02/the-corruption-of-the-world-health-organization-who/ |title=The Corruption of the World Health Organization (WHO) |last=Toplansky |first=Eileen F. |init= |publisher=NWO Report |formatdate=2022-08-02 |quoteaccessdate=2022-12-26

[[Category:OrganizationsOrganization]]

[[de:WHO]] [[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}Weltgesundheitsorganisation]]