Difference between revisions of "I'm an intactivist because I care about saving babies from severe pain."

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add REF section.)
(Add author link.)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
  |init=J
 
  |init=J
 
  |first=Janice
 
  |first=Janice
  |author-link=
+
  |author-link=Janice Lander
 
  |last2=Brady-Frerer
 
  |last2=Brady-Frerer
 
  |init2=B
 
  |init2=B

Revision as of 17:03, 8 March 2024

"I'm an intactivist because I care about saving babies from severe pain." This is a sentiment frequently expressed by knowledgeable intactivists, who believe that greedy doctors like to collect their fee by performing medically-not-indicated, non-therapeutic circumcision on newborn babies who are too young to receive general anesthesia, that the analgesia offered primarily relieves parental guilt, and the baby boy still feels extreme pain,[1] that may cause him to go into shock.

References

  1. REFjournal Lander J, Brady-Frerer B, Metcalfe JB, Nazerali S, Muttit S. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision. JAMA. 24 December 1997; 278(24): 2157-64. PMID. Retrieved 8 March 2024.