Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sexual effects of circumcision

430 bytes added, 22 June
Add text and citation.
}}</ref> They concluded, "Evidence has also started to accumulate that male circumcision may result in lifelong physical, sexual, and sometimes psychological harm as well."
[[Morris L. Sorrells | Sorrells]] et al. (2007), in the study discussed above, measured fine-touch pressure thresholds of the penis, and concluded "The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the [[uncircumcised]] penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates" (removes) "the most sensitive parts of the penis." According to Sorrells et al., the five penile areas most sensitive to fine-touch are located on the foreskin.<ref name= "sorrells2007" />
In 2009, Schober et al. reported on self-assessed sexual sensitivity in 81 men, 11 of whom were [[uncircumcised]]. When assessing areas producing sexual pleasure, the [[foreskin]] was ranked 7th, after the [[glans]], lower and upper shaft, and the left and right sides of the [[penis]], but above the area between scrotum and anus, the scrotum itself, and the anus.<ref name= "schober2008">{{REFjournal
* [[Masturbation]]
* [[Penis]]
* [[Premature ejaculation]]
* [[Ridged band]]
* [[Psychosexual Effects of Circumcision]]
|quote=When the penis enters the vagina, the foreskin is pulled back. And on its way out again, the foreskin goes back to cover the penis head. This way the foreskin stimulates both the man and the woman.
}}
* {{REFweb |url=https://intactamerica.org/ask-marilyn-i-was-circumcised-and-theres-nothing-wrong-with-me-why-do-cut-men-complain/ |title=Ask Marilyn – I was circumcised, and there’s nothing wrong with me. Why do cut men complain? |last=Milos |first=Marilyn |init= |author-link=Marilyn Fayre Milos |publisher=Intact America |date=2022-06-27 |accessdate=2024-06-21}}
{{ABBR}}
{{REF}}
16,007
edits

Navigation menu