Changes

'''Redundant foreskin''' (aka '''Insufficient foreskin removal''') is classed technically as a [[complication]]. The major issue is cosmetic because the expected [[circumcised ]] appearance has not been achieved. There are no additional health issues from insufficient [[foreskin]] removal. A [[Adolescent and adult circumcision| circumcision]] revision is usually carried out to achieve the desired appearance.<ref>{{REFjournal

There is no accepted definition of redundant [[foreskin]].==Acroposthion==A longer [[foreskin]] that some may consider "redundant", also may be considered to be an [[acroposthion]], that was highly regarded in ancient Greece.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal |last=Hodges |first=Frederick M. |author-link=Frederick M. Hodges |etal=no |title=The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme |trans-title= |language= |journal=Bull. Hist. Med |location= |date=2001-09 |volume=75 |issue=3 |pages=375-405 |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/history/hodges2/ |quote= |pubmedID=11568485 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1353/bhm.2001.0119 |accessdate=2019-11-15}}</ref>