Difference between revisions of "Dr. Bidair"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m (Add text.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Construction Site}} | {{Construction Site}} | ||
| − | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary [[adult circumcision]].<ref>{{REFweb | + | '''{{FULLPAGENAME}}''' is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary [[adult circumcision]] surgery.<ref>{{REFweb |
|url=https://intactamerica.org/debunking-circumcision-myths/ | |url=https://intactamerica.org/debunking-circumcision-myths/ | ||
|title=Debunking A Pro-Circumcision Doctor’s Arguments: The Real Truth Behind the Myths | |title=Debunking A Pro-Circumcision Doctor’s Arguments: The Real Truth Behind the Myths | ||
Revision as of 02:17, 29 September 2024
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
Dr. Bidair is a California-based promoter of usually unnecessary adult circumcision surgery.[1]
Dr. Bidair has a website but the sexual effects of circumcision are not well-communicated. The surgeon most provide all material information to the patient before informed consent can be granted. There is a strong tendency for the surgeon to omit telling the patient anything about the nature and functions of the foreskin. Masood has emphasized the importance of telling men correctly.[2] however the information provided by Dr. Bidair does not satisfy the legal requirements of informed consent.
It is not known how many of his patients are regret men.
References
- ↑
Alissa, Kristel (26 September 2024). Debunking A Pro-Circumcision Doctor’s Arguments: The Real Truth Behind the Myths
, Intact America. Retrieved 28 September 2024. - ↑
Masood S, et al. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision: are we informing men correctly?. Urol Int. 2005; 75(1): 62-6. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
