20,862
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add text and citation.
|accessdate=2024-12-15
}}
==Critical commentary==Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."<ref>{{REFjournal |last=Bossio |first= |init=JA |author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio |last2=Pukall |first2= |init2=CF |author2-link= |last3=Steele |first3= |init3=SS |author3-link= |etal=no |title=Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing |trans-title= |language= |journal=J Urol |location= |date=2016-06 |volume=195 |issue=6 |pages=1848-53 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/ |archived= |quote=The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites |pubmedID=26724395 |pubmedCID= |DOI=10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080 |accessdate=2024-12-15}}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]]