Difference between revisions of "Jennifer A. Bossio"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add citation.) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text and citation.) |
||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
|accessdate=2024-12-15 | |accessdate=2024-12-15 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | ==Critical commentary== | |
+ | Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
+ | |last=Bossio | ||
+ | |first= | ||
+ | |init=JA | ||
+ | |author-link=Jennifer A. Bossio | ||
+ | |last2=Pukall | ||
+ | |first2= | ||
+ | |init2=CF | ||
+ | |author2-link= | ||
+ | |last3=Steele | ||
+ | |first3= | ||
+ | |init3=SS | ||
+ | |author3-link= | ||
+ | |etal=no | ||
+ | |title=Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing | ||
+ | |trans-title= | ||
+ | |language= | ||
+ | |journal=J Urol | ||
+ | |location= | ||
+ | |date=2016-06 | ||
+ | |volume=195 | ||
+ | |issue=6 | ||
+ | |pages=1848-53 | ||
+ | |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724395/ | ||
+ | |archived= | ||
+ | |quote=The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites | ||
+ | |pubmedID=26724395 | ||
+ | |pubmedCID= | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.080 | ||
+ | |accessdate=2024-12-15 | ||
+ | }}</ref> This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies. | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Sexual effects of circumcision]] | * [[Sexual effects of circumcision]] |
Revision as of 17:45, 16 December 2024
Adjunct Assistant Professor Jennifer A. Bossio, M.S.[a 1], Ph.D.[a 2], C. Psych., is a Canadian psychologist at Queens University in the Department of Urology.[1]
Dr. Bossio also maintains a private practice.[2]
Contents
Publications
- Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. J Sex Med. December 2014; 11(12): 2847-64. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
- Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Bartley K. You either have it or you don’t: The impact of male circumcision status on sexual partners . The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2015; 24(2): 104–19. DOI.
- Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele SS. Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing. J Urol. June 2016; 195(6): 1848-53. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Quote:The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites
- Bossio JA. Re: Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Quantitative Sensory Testing . J Urol. 2016; 195: 1821-26. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
- Bossio JA, Pukall CF. Attitude Toward One's Circumcision Status Is More Important than Actual Circumcision Status for Men's Body Image and Sexual Functioning . Arch Sex Behav. April 2018; 47(3): 771-81. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Critical commentary
Bossio et al. have argued that, "Penile sensitivity did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site."[3] This is an outlier position that is in conflict with several other studies.
See also
External links
- Official website. Retrieved 15 December 2024
Abbreviations
- ↑
Master of Science
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 13 October 2021. (Latin: magisterii scientiae; also abbreviated MS, MSc, M.Sc., SM, S.M., ScM or Sc.M.) - ↑
Doctor of Philosophy
, Wikipedia. Retrieved 16 June 2021. (Also abbreviated as D.Phil.)
References
- ↑ Bossio, Jennifer (January 2023).
Curriculum Vitae
. Retrieved 16 December 2024. - ↑ Bossio, Jenn.
Meet Dr. Jenn Bossio, C.Psych
, Tri Health Clinic. Retrieved 15 December 2024. - ↑ Bossio JA, Pukall CF, Steele SS. Examining Penile Sensitivity in Neonatally Circumcised and Intact Men Using Qualitative Sensory Testing. J Urol. June 2016; 195(6): 1848-53. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
Quote:The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites