20,862
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Comment by Shea Lita Bond
==Comment by Shea Lita Bond==
Shea Lita Bond reviewed the issues presented in the 2025 Hadachek in her article comment in The ''John Marshall Law Review''. She concluded as follows:
<blockquote>
Both male and female circumcision are medically unnecessary procedures that can cause children to experience physical and psychological harm. State legislatures enacted FGM statutes to protect female minors from circumcision complications, but never extended the same protection to male children. This ''Comment '' does not suggest that female circumcision is less important than male circumcision or that it is not a serious human rights problem. However, here in the United States male minors face circumcision at a wider scale, yet they are not legally protected from this painful, medically unnecessary procedure. Laws criminalizing female circumcision are a step in the right direction toward protecting child welfare. However, all children are at risk of being circumcised and yet currently only half are protected under state laws.
</blockquote>